The Curriculum / Reader / AI User Experience
LEVEL 3 · ADVANCED · INDIVIDUAL TRACK

AI User Experience

This page compiles 5 files from the repository, verbatim, in reading order. The living version: this folder on GitHub.

level-3-advanced/individual/13-user-experience/README.md

AI User Experience

The interface must make the system’s limits legible without making users read a lecture. Design for uncertainty, interruption, correction, latency, and recovery—not the happy-path screenshot.

Treat this as an operating document, not a reading assignment. For Belle Realty or a property-management assistant, define the unit of work, owner, allowed failure modes, and the customer-visible consequence before choosing a model or framework. A system that gives plausible answers but cannot be measured, contained, or recovered is not production-ready.

Design stance

Start with a narrow contract. State what enters the boundary, what the component may read or change, what it must return, and when it must stop. Put the contract in version control alongside representative tenant, listing, maintenance, and leasing cases. Prefer a deterministic rule when one exists; use model judgment only where language or ambiguity genuinely adds value.

Operating loop

Instrument every request with a correlation ID, model and prompt version, retrieval version, tool calls, latency, token usage, policy decisions, and final outcome. Review a small, stratified sample of real traffic weekly. Track failures by property, workflow, language, channel, and tenant impact; aggregate averages hide the exact bad experience that produces churn.

Controls

Set an explicit threshold that changes behavior: block, require approval, degrade to search-only, route to a cheaper model, or page an owner. Test the threshold with synthetic failures and recent production examples. Do not make a dashboard metric a promise unless a named person can act on it within a defined window.

Production exercise

Apply this to a maintenance triage request: a resident reports a gas smell at 2 a.m. Document the safe path, the tool permissions, the human escalation, the message shown to the resident, and the evidence retained for review. Ship only after the behavior is repeatable in a rehearsal.

Exit criteria

The implementation has a written contract, measurable outcomes, a failure path, an accountable owner, and a rollback or containment action. If any is missing, it is still a prototype.

level-3-advanced/individual/13-user-experience/confidence-communication.md

Confidence Communication

Do not show invented percentages. Communicate what the assistant used, what it could not verify, and the safe next action. Reserve strong language for evidence-backed answers and surface citations at the decision point.

Treat this as an operating document, not a reading assignment. For Belle Realty or a property-management assistant, define the unit of work, owner, allowed failure modes, and the customer-visible consequence before choosing a model or framework. A system that gives plausible answers but cannot be measured, contained, or recovered is not production-ready.

Design stance

Start with a narrow contract. State what enters the boundary, what the component may read or change, what it must return, and when it must stop. Put the contract in version control alongside representative tenant, listing, maintenance, and leasing cases. Prefer a deterministic rule when one exists; use model judgment only where language or ambiguity genuinely adds value.

Operating loop

Instrument every request with a correlation ID, model and prompt version, retrieval version, tool calls, latency, token usage, policy decisions, and final outcome. Review a small, stratified sample of real traffic weekly. Track failures by property, workflow, language, channel, and tenant impact; aggregate averages hide the exact bad experience that produces churn.

Controls

Set an explicit threshold that changes behavior: block, require approval, degrade to search-only, route to a cheaper model, or page an owner. Test the threshold with synthetic failures and recent production examples. Do not make a dashboard metric a promise unless a named person can act on it within a defined window.

Production exercise

Apply this to a maintenance triage request: a resident reports a gas smell at 2 a.m. Document the safe path, the tool permissions, the human escalation, the message shown to the resident, and the evidence retained for review. Ship only after the behavior is repeatable in a rehearsal.

Exit criteria

The implementation has a written contract, measurable outcomes, a failure path, an accountable owner, and a rollback or containment action. If any is missing, it is still a prototype.

level-3-advanced/individual/13-user-experience/graceful-degradation.md

Graceful Degradation

When a model, retrieval store, or tool fails, retain the essential product path: search, form submission, queued request, human contact, or clear status. A blank chat window is not graceful degradation.

Treat this as an operating document, not a reading assignment. For Belle Realty or a property-management assistant, define the unit of work, owner, allowed failure modes, and the customer-visible consequence before choosing a model or framework. A system that gives plausible answers but cannot be measured, contained, or recovered is not production-ready.

Design stance

Start with a narrow contract. State what enters the boundary, what the component may read or change, what it must return, and when it must stop. Put the contract in version control alongside representative tenant, listing, maintenance, and leasing cases. Prefer a deterministic rule when one exists; use model judgment only where language or ambiguity genuinely adds value.

Operating loop

Instrument every request with a correlation ID, model and prompt version, retrieval version, tool calls, latency, token usage, policy decisions, and final outcome. Review a small, stratified sample of real traffic weekly. Track failures by property, workflow, language, channel, and tenant impact; aggregate averages hide the exact bad experience that produces churn.

Controls

Set an explicit threshold that changes behavior: block, require approval, degrade to search-only, route to a cheaper model, or page an owner. Test the threshold with synthetic failures and recent production examples. Do not make a dashboard metric a promise unless a named person can act on it within a defined window.

Production exercise

Apply this to a maintenance triage request: a resident reports a gas smell at 2 a.m. Document the safe path, the tool permissions, the human escalation, the message shown to the resident, and the evidence retained for review. Ship only after the behavior is repeatable in a rehearsal.

Exit criteria

The implementation has a written contract, measurable outcomes, a failure path, an accountable owner, and a rollback or containment action. If any is missing, it is still a prototype.

level-3-advanced/individual/13-user-experience/streaming-ux.md

Streaming UX

Stream when progressive work helps comprehension, but distinguish draft reasoning from verified result. Show useful activity, allow cancellation, preserve partial work safely, and avoid animated filler while a hidden tool call stalls.

Treat this as an operating document, not a reading assignment. For Belle Realty or a property-management assistant, define the unit of work, owner, allowed failure modes, and the customer-visible consequence before choosing a model or framework. A system that gives plausible answers but cannot be measured, contained, or recovered is not production-ready.

Design stance

Start with a narrow contract. State what enters the boundary, what the component may read or change, what it must return, and when it must stop. Put the contract in version control alongside representative tenant, listing, maintenance, and leasing cases. Prefer a deterministic rule when one exists; use model judgment only where language or ambiguity genuinely adds value.

Operating loop

Instrument every request with a correlation ID, model and prompt version, retrieval version, tool calls, latency, token usage, policy decisions, and final outcome. Review a small, stratified sample of real traffic weekly. Track failures by property, workflow, language, channel, and tenant impact; aggregate averages hide the exact bad experience that produces churn.

Controls

Set an explicit threshold that changes behavior: block, require approval, degrade to search-only, route to a cheaper model, or page an owner. Test the threshold with synthetic failures and recent production examples. Do not make a dashboard metric a promise unless a named person can act on it within a defined window.

Production exercise

Apply this to a maintenance triage request: a resident reports a gas smell at 2 a.m. Document the safe path, the tool permissions, the human escalation, the message shown to the resident, and the evidence retained for review. Ship only after the behavior is repeatable in a rehearsal.

Exit criteria

The implementation has a written contract, measurable outcomes, a failure path, an accountable owner, and a rollback or containment action. If any is missing, it is still a prototype.

level-3-advanced/individual/13-user-experience/trust-repair.md

Trust Repair

After an error, say what was wrong, correct it, explain the immediate safeguard, and offer a route to a human. Do not hide behind “AI can make mistakes” when the system had a preventable control gap.

Treat this as an operating document, not a reading assignment. For Belle Realty or a property-management assistant, define the unit of work, owner, allowed failure modes, and the customer-visible consequence before choosing a model or framework. A system that gives plausible answers but cannot be measured, contained, or recovered is not production-ready.

Design stance

Start with a narrow contract. State what enters the boundary, what the component may read or change, what it must return, and when it must stop. Put the contract in version control alongside representative tenant, listing, maintenance, and leasing cases. Prefer a deterministic rule when one exists; use model judgment only where language or ambiguity genuinely adds value.

Operating loop

Instrument every request with a correlation ID, model and prompt version, retrieval version, tool calls, latency, token usage, policy decisions, and final outcome. Review a small, stratified sample of real traffic weekly. Track failures by property, workflow, language, channel, and tenant impact; aggregate averages hide the exact bad experience that produces churn.

Controls

Set an explicit threshold that changes behavior: block, require approval, degrade to search-only, route to a cheaper model, or page an owner. Test the threshold with synthetic failures and recent production examples. Do not make a dashboard metric a promise unless a named person can act on it within a defined window.

Production exercise

Apply this to a maintenance triage request: a resident reports a gas smell at 2 a.m. Document the safe path, the tool permissions, the human escalation, the message shown to the resident, and the evidence retained for review. Ship only after the behavior is repeatable in a rehearsal.

Exit criteria

The implementation has a written contract, measurable outcomes, a failure path, an accountable owner, and a rollback or containment action. If any is missing, it is still a prototype.

← Data Engineering for AI Level 3 Systems Glossary →