The Curriculum / Reader / 10 — Rollout Playbook
LEVEL 1 · ESSENTIALS · COMPANY TRACK

10 — Rollout Playbook

This page compiles 4 files from the repository, verbatim, in reading order. The living version: this folder on GitHub.

level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/README.md

10 — Rollout Playbook

How to go from Day 0 to a company-wide AI program in 90 days, then continue.

Files

The three phases

Success criteria at Day 90

level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/30-60-90-plan.md

30-60-90 Rollout Plan

The company's rollout playbook. Assumes you're starting from ~0 AI maturity.

Day 0 — Prerequisites

Before Day 1: - Executive sponsor identified and committed - Steering Committee members named (5-7 people) - Initial budget approved (see budget-and-billing-model.md) - Legal + Security + IT engaged - Communications plan drafted

Days 1–30 — Foundation

Governance

Accounts & procurement

Prompts & personas

Training

Success criteria at Day 30

Days 31–60 — First workflows

Deploy first workflows

Evaluation

Observability

Communication

Success criteria at Day 60

Days 61–90 — Expand and measure

Expand

Measure

Iterate

Success criteria at Day 90

Days 91+ — Steady state

Enter continuous mode: - Monthly steering committee - Quarterly refresh + bake-offs - Biannual department deep-dives - Annual audit + strategy refresh - Continuous eval regression - Continuous adoption expansion

Rollout risks and mitigations

Risk Mitigation
Slow adoption AI Champions, showcases, incentives, manager expectations
Data leak incident AUP, tool tiering, redaction, training, monitoring
Runaway cost Gateway with per-team budgets, spend alerts, cache strategy
Poor quality Eval framework, HITL, staged rollout
Shadow IT Clear approved list, easy access, active enforcement
Employee anxiety Transparent communication, upskilling, no-layoffs-from-AI commitment where credible

Executive checkpoints

level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/expansion-decision-framework.md

Expansion Decision Framework

When and how to expand from pilot to broader rollout.

The decision moments

Three natural checkpoints:

  1. Pilot → Department: After 30 days, expand to the full pilot department?
  2. Department → Adjacent Departments: After 60 days, roll to more departments?
  3. Adjacent → Company-wide: After 90 days, roll to everyone?

Do not skip stages. Each stage teaches you something you can't learn from the previous.

Gate criteria — Pilot → Department

Must have all:

Should have most:

Gate criteria — Department → Adjacent

Same as above, plus:

Gate criteria — Adjacent → Company-wide

All previous gates, plus:

Warning signs — Do NOT expand

Any of these = pause:

The rollback playbook

If a workflow fails after expansion:

  1. Contain — pause the workflow immediately if quality/safety broken
  2. Diagnose — analyze eval regression, user complaints, incident logs
  3. Fix — revert to last known good version, or re-do the workflow
  4. Communicate — tell affected users honestly what happened
  5. Post-mortem — blameless, structural fixes
  6. Re-launch — after fixes, run pilot-scale again

Communication cadence during expansion

Expansion staffing

Successful expansion needs staffing. Typical model:

Do not attempt company-wide rollout without this staffing.

Long-term ambition setting

After 90 days, the Steering Committee sets 12-month and 24-month ambition:

Sunset criteria

Retire workflows that: - Fall below quality threshold and can't be fixed - Have adoption < 20% after 6 months - Are superseded by better tools - Violate updated policies - No longer have an owner

Sunset formally: announce retirement, provide alternatives, archive assets, remove from launchers.

level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/pilot-selection-criteria.md

Pilot Selection Criteria

How to pick which workflows and departments go first.

The scoring model

Score each candidate on 1-5:

Dimension 1 3 5
Time saved / week < 30 min 2-4 hours > 8 hours
Volume Rare Weekly Daily
Repeatability Unique Similar-ish Nearly identical
Sponsor enthusiasm Neutral Interested Champion-level
Data availability Fragmented Some accessible Fully in one system
Risk of harm High blast radius Bounded Read-only
Measurable ROI Vague Estimable Directly measurable
Time to value > 90 days 30-90 days < 30 days

Total 40. Pick candidates scoring ≥ 30.

The archetypes of good first pilots

Archetype 1 — High-volume drafting

Archetype 2 — Research and synthesis

Archetype 3 — Data extraction

Archetype 4 — Q&A over docs (RAG)

Archetypes to AVOID first

Department readiness scoring

Before picking a department for pilot:

Signal Score
Has an internal champion +5
Manager committed to sponsor +5
Backlog of well-defined workflows +5
Comfortable with iteration +5
History of adopting new tools +3
Data lives in modern systems +3
Team is not in a crunch +2
High turnover / instability -5
Prior AI experiment failed -3
Regulatory constraints unusual -3

Departments scoring ≥ 20 are ready. Below 15, wait or invest in readiness first.

The recommended first-pilot mix

Two departments, chosen to demonstrate range:

Total 4-6 workflows across those two departments in the first pilot.

Success bar for the pilot

At the end of 60 days: - ≥ 60% of pilot department using ≥ 1 workflow weekly - Quality metrics ≥ baseline - No critical incidents - Champion recommends expansion - Sponsor recommends expansion - Steering Committee approves expansion

If any of these fail, do not expand. Iterate first.

← 09 — Training Level 1 shared materials →