The Curriculum / Reader / 10 — Rollout Playbook
LEVEL 1 · ESSENTIALS · COMPANY TRACK
10 — Rollout Playbook
This page compiles 4 files from the repository, verbatim, in reading order. The living version: this folder on GitHub .
level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/README.md
10 — Rollout Playbook
How to go from Day 0 to a company-wide AI program in 90 days, then continue.
Files
30-60-90-plan.md — the day-by-day rollout plan
pilot-selection-criteria.md — how to pick first workflows and departments
expansion-decision-framework.md — when and how to expand from pilot → dept → company
The three phases
Days 1-30 — Foundation: governance, accounts, prompts, training basics
Days 31-60 — First workflows: pilot with 2 departments, launch first agents
Days 61-90 — Expand and measure: roll to more departments, measure ROI
Success criteria at Day 90
60%+ of company using AI weekly
10+ production workflows
Cost within budget
3+ measurable ROI examples
Employee NPS ≥ 40
level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/30-60-90-plan.md
30-60-90 Rollout Plan
The company's rollout playbook. Assumes you're starting from ~0 AI maturity.
Day 0 — Prerequisites
Before Day 1:
- Executive sponsor identified and committed
- Steering Committee members named (5-7 people)
- Initial budget approved (see budget-and-billing-model.md)
- Legal + Security + IT engaged
- Communications plan drafted
Days 1–30 — Foundation
Governance
[ ] AUP drafted and reviewed (company/01-governance/acceptable-use-policy.md)
[ ] Data classification matrix approved (company/01-governance/data-classification-matrix.md)
[ ] Vendor DPA checklist ready
[ ] Incident response addendum in place
[ ] Steering Committee charter signed
Accounts & procurement
[ ] ChatGPT Enterprise procured (or equivalent enterprise chat)
[ ] Claude Team / Enterprise procured
[ ] Perplexity Enterprise procured
[ ] Copilot / Cursor site license procured
[ ] LLM gateway selected (Portkey / LiteLLM / OpenRouter)
[ ] Vector DB selected (pgvector for start, or Pinecone if scale is high)
[ ] SSO integration confirmed for each
Prompts & personas
[ ] Company-wide system prompt drafted (company/03-system-prompts/company-system-prompt.md)
[ ] Legal disclaimer library published
[ ] 15 company-wide prompts loaded to enterprise workspaces
[ ] Individual master system prompt template distributed
Training
[ ] Onboarding curriculum ready
[ ] AI Champions named (one per department)
[ ] Champions trained on the kit
[ ] Employee kickoff communication sent
Success criteria at Day 30
100% of employees have accounts and have completed Module 1
100% of managers know the AUP
Steering Committee met at least twice
Zero data classification incidents
Days 31–60 — First workflows
Deploy first workflows
[ ] Individual prompt library rolled out to all employees
[ ] Department copilot launched for 2 pilot departments (usually Sales + Support)
[ ] Meeting-notes-to-CRM agent piloted for sales team
[ ] Inbox triage agent piloted with 10 volunteers
Evaluation
[ ] Eval sets built for the first two department copilots (25 cases minimum each)
[ ] Baseline scores captured
[ ] Weekly regression running
Observability
[ ] All LLM calls flowing through gateway
[ ] Logging + redaction verified
[ ] Cost dashboards live
[ ] Adoption dashboards live
Communication
[ ] "AI at [Company]" internal newsletter launched (biweekly)
[ ] First "what shipped" showcase completed
[ ] Employee feedback survey run
Success criteria at Day 60
≥ 50% of pilot department employees actively using their copilot weekly
3 real production workflows live
Cost tracking working; monthly spend within 80-120% of forecast
Zero critical incidents
Days 61–90 — Expand and measure
Expand
[ ] Department copilots launched for 3 more departments
[ ] Weekly report generator rolled out company-wide (opt-in)
[ ] Second wave of 5 department-specific workflows shipped
Measure
[ ] ROI measurement framework applied to first workflows
[ ] Adoption goals set per department
[ ] Cost per resolved-item baselined
[ ] Executive dashboard reviewed
Iterate
[ ] First model bake-off completed
[ ] Prompt library reviewed and pruned
[ ] Retired workflows documented
[ ] Rules and policies updated per learning
Success criteria at Day 90
≥ 60% of company using AI weekly
10+ production workflows live
Cost within budget
One completed model bake-off with a decision
Executive team can point to 3 measurable ROI examples
Employee NPS on AI program ≥ 40
Days 91+ — Steady state
Enter continuous mode:
- Monthly steering committee
- Quarterly refresh + bake-offs
- Biannual department deep-dives
- Annual audit + strategy refresh
- Continuous eval regression
- Continuous adoption expansion
Rollout risks and mitigations
Risk
Mitigation
Slow adoption
AI Champions, showcases, incentives, manager expectations
Data leak incident
AUP, tool tiering, redaction, training, monitoring
Runaway cost
Gateway with per-team budgets, spend alerts, cache strategy
Poor quality
Eval framework, HITL, staged rollout
Shadow IT
Clear approved list, easy access, active enforcement
Employee anxiety
Transparent communication, upskilling, no-layoffs-from-AI commitment where credible
Executive checkpoints
Day 30: Governance + accounts confirmed
Day 60: First workflows shipping
Day 90: ROI evidence + roll-forward plan
Quarterly thereafter: dashboard review
level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/expansion-decision-framework.md
Expansion Decision Framework
When and how to expand from pilot to broader rollout.
The decision moments
Three natural checkpoints:
Pilot → Department: After 30 days, expand to the full pilot department?
Department → Adjacent Departments: After 60 days, roll to more departments?
Adjacent → Company-wide: After 90 days, roll to everyone?
Do not skip stages. Each stage teaches you something you can't learn from the previous.
Gate criteria — Pilot → Department
Must have all:
[ ] Quality: aggregate eval score ≥ 80% of maximum
[ ] Safety: zero P1 incidents in pilot period
[ ] Adoption: ≥ 70% of pilot users active weekly
[ ] User NPS: ≥ 40 among pilot users
[ ] Cost: within budget
[ ] Owner ready: department Champion recommends expansion
[ ] Docs ready: SOP, prompts, training material updated
Should have most:
[ ] Time-saved estimate confirmed (rough ROI)
[ ] At least 3 case studies from real users
[ ] Retrospective completed with lessons captured
Gate criteria — Department → Adjacent
Same as above, plus:
[ ] Champion identified in target department
[ ] Adjacent department's data and permissions ready
[ ] Playbook adjusted for new department's context
[ ] Steering Committee approval
Gate criteria — Adjacent → Company-wide
All previous gates, plus:
[ ] Cross-department feedback synthesized
[ ] Training scaled (recording available, self-serve)
[ ] Support model defined (help channel, escalations, office hours)
[ ] Enterprise licensing at scale
[ ] Formal exec sponsor for full rollout
[ ] Comms plan for company-wide announcement
Warning signs — Do NOT expand
Any of these = pause:
Any P1 safety incident
Adoption < 50% at expected marker
Quality trending down
Cost trending above 130% of forecast
Employee sentiment negative
Champion resigns or is deprioritized
Change in exec sponsor commitment
The rollback playbook
If a workflow fails after expansion:
Contain — pause the workflow immediately if quality/safety broken
Diagnose — analyze eval regression, user complaints, incident logs
Fix — revert to last known good version, or re-do the workflow
Communicate — tell affected users honestly what happened
Post-mortem — blameless, structural fixes
Re-launch — after fixes, run pilot-scale again
Communication cadence during expansion
Weekly: operational update to Steering Committee
Bi-weekly: all-hands mention of AI wins
Monthly: exec dashboard review
Quarterly: full program review with board or leadership
Expansion staffing
Successful expansion needs staffing. Typical model:
1 AI Champion per department (partial FTE — usually 20%)
1 AI Program Manager central (full FTE)
1 AI Platform Engineer central (full FTE, more as scale grows)
1 Security/Legal partner central (partial FTE)
1 L&D partner central (partial FTE)
Do not attempt company-wide rollout without this staffing.
Long-term ambition setting
After 90 days, the Steering Committee sets 12-month and 24-month ambition:
Coverage goal: % of workforce using AI weekly (target: 90% in year 1)
Depth goal: average workflows per user (target: 3 in year 1)
Cost goal: cost per user per month (target: within enterprise SaaS band)
Value goal: measured productivity or revenue impact (target: 10-20% team-relative)
Sunset criteria
Retire workflows that:
- Fall below quality threshold and can't be fixed
- Have adoption < 20% after 6 months
- Are superseded by better tools
- Violate updated policies
- No longer have an owner
Sunset formally: announce retirement, provide alternatives, archive assets, remove from launchers.
level-1-essentials/company/10-rollout-playbook/pilot-selection-criteria.md
Pilot Selection Criteria
How to pick which workflows and departments go first.
The scoring model
Score each candidate on 1-5:
Dimension
1
3
5
Time saved / week
< 30 min
2-4 hours
> 8 hours
Volume
Rare
Weekly
Daily
Repeatability
Unique
Similar-ish
Nearly identical
Sponsor enthusiasm
Neutral
Interested
Champion-level
Data availability
Fragmented
Some accessible
Fully in one system
Risk of harm
High blast radius
Bounded
Read-only
Measurable ROI
Vague
Estimable
Directly measurable
Time to value
> 90 days
30-90 days
< 30 days
Total 40. Pick candidates scoring ≥ 30.
The archetypes of good first pilots
Archetype 1 — High-volume drafting
Sales follow-ups, support responses, marketing content
Well-defined output format
Human always reviews before send
Easy to measure time-per-task
Archetype 2 — Research and synthesis
Weekly reports, competitive research, meeting briefs
Reads a lot, writes a summary
Low-risk (informational)
Individual productivity gain
Archetype 3 — Data extraction
Contracts, receipts, resumes, forms
Structured output
Ground-truth easy to check
Bounded blast radius
Archetype 4 — Q&A over docs (RAG)
Employee handbook Q&A, policy Q&A, product-doc Q&A
Frequency: many small asks per day
Reduces load on subject-matter experts
Confidence-scored answers
Archetypes to AVOID first
Autonomous external communication — sending emails, posting to social
High-stakes irreversible decisions — approvals, denials, pricing
Regulated workflows without human review — HIPAA, GLBA, GDPR-restricted
Anything requiring long-horizon planning — plans over 5-10 steps are still fragile
Novel domains without eval data — no way to know if it works
Department readiness scoring
Before picking a department for pilot:
Signal
Score
Has an internal champion
+5
Manager committed to sponsor
+5
Backlog of well-defined workflows
+5
Comfortable with iteration
+5
History of adopting new tools
+3
Data lives in modern systems
+3
Team is not in a crunch
+2
High turnover / instability
-5
Prior AI experiment failed
-3
Regulatory constraints unusual
-3
Departments scoring ≥ 20 are ready. Below 15, wait or invest in readiness first.
The recommended first-pilot mix
Two departments, chosen to demonstrate range:
One customer-facing (Sales or Support) — validates external-quality workflow
One internal-facing (Ops, Finance, or HR) — validates safer internal workflow
Total 4-6 workflows across those two departments in the first pilot.
Success bar for the pilot
At the end of 60 days:
- ≥ 60% of pilot department using ≥ 1 workflow weekly
- Quality metrics ≥ baseline
- No critical incidents
- Champion recommends expansion
- Sponsor recommends expansion
- Steering Committee approves expansion
If any of these fail, do not expand. Iterate first.